candidate: were for president

Property	Similarity
were for president	1.00
be for president	0.96
were for president chosen in jeffersonian	0.91
were for president chosen	0.91
running for president	0.87
were for president chosen during democracy	0.85
were for president chosen during jacksonian democracy	0.85
were for presidency	0.79
be for president nominated	0.79
were for presidency chosen	0.78

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.72

Typical(candidate, were for president) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(candidate, be for president)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.60

Salient(candidate, were for president) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Salient(candidate, running for president)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.43

Remarkable(candidate, were for president) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Remarkable(candidate, running for president)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.72

Typical(candidate, were for president) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(candidate, running for president)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(candidate, were for president) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Plausible(candidate, running for president)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(candidate, were for president) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(candidate, be for president)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.72

Typical(candidate, were for president) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(candidate, were for president chosen)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.60

Salient(candidate, were for president) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Salient(candidate, be for president)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.72

Typical(candidate, were for president) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(candidate, were for president chosen in jeffersonian)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.43

Remarkable(candidate, were for president) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(candidate, be for president)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(candidate, were for president) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(candidate, were for president chosen)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.43

Remarkable(candidate, were for president) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(candidate, were for president chosen)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.43

Remarkable(candidate, were for president) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(candidate, were for president chosen in jeffersonian)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.72

Typical(candidate, were for president) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(candidate, were for president chosen during democracy)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.60

Salient(candidate, were for president) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Salient(candidate, were for president chosen)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.72

Typical(candidate, were for president) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(candidate, were for president chosen during jacksonian democracy)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.72

Typical(candidate, were for president) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(candidate, were for presidency)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(candidate, were for president) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(candidate, were for president chosen in jeffersonian)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.72

Typical(candidate, were for president) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(candidate, be for president nominated)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.43

Remarkable(candidate, were for president) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(candidate, were for president chosen during democracy)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.60

Salient(candidate, were for president) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Salient(candidate, were for president chosen in jeffersonian)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.72

Typical(candidate, were for president) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(candidate, were for presidency chosen)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.43

Remarkable(candidate, were for president) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(candidate, were for president chosen during jacksonian democracy)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(candidate, were for president) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Plausible(candidate, were for presidency)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(candidate, were for president) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(candidate, were for president chosen during democracy)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(candidate, were for president) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Plausible(candidate, were for president chosen during jacksonian democracy)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.60

Salient(candidate, were for president) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Salient(candidate, were for presidency)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(candidate, were for president) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(candidate, be for president nominated)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.60

Salient(candidate, were for president) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Salient(candidate, were for president chosen during democracy)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.43

Remarkable(candidate, were for president) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(candidate, were for presidency)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.60

Salient(candidate, were for president) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Salient(candidate, were for president chosen during jacksonian democracy)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(candidate, were for president) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(candidate, were for presidency chosen)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.43

Remarkable(candidate, were for president) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(candidate, were for presidency chosen)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.43

Remarkable(candidate, were for president) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(candidate, be for president nominated)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.60

Salient(candidate, were for president) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Salient(candidate, be for president nominated)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.60

Salient(candidate, were for president) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Salient(candidate, were for presidency chosen)

Parents	political party Weight: 0.68 , person Weight: 0.60 , individual Weight: 0.60 , activist Weight: 0.57
Siblings	third party Weight: 0.69 , general election Weight: 0.65 , congressman Weight: 0.63 , democrat Weight: 0.63 , libertarian Weight: 0.63

candidate: were for president

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings