candidate: be interested in position

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents political party
Weight: 0.68
, person
Weight: 0.60
, individual
Weight: 0.60
, activist
Weight: 0.57
Siblings third party
Weight: 0.69
, general election
Weight: 0.65
, congressman
Weight: 0.63
, democrat
Weight: 0.63
, libertarian
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be interested in position 1.00
be interested in company 0.84
be qualified for position 0.83
be suitable for position 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(candidate, be interested in position) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(candidate, be interested in position)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(candidate, be interested in position) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(candidate, be interested in company)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(candidate, be interested in position) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(candidate, be qualified for position)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(candidate, be interested in position) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(candidate, be suitable for position)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(candidate, be interested in position) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(candidate, be interested in company)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(candidate, be interested in position) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(candidate, be suitable for position)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(candidate, be interested in position) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(candidate, be interested in company)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(candidate, be interested in position) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(candidate, be qualified for position)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(candidate, be interested in position) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(candidate, be suitable for position)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(candidate, be interested in position) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(candidate, be interested in company)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(candidate, be interested in position) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(candidate, be suitable for position)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(candidate, be interested in position) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(candidate, be qualified for position)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(candidate, be interested in position) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(candidate, be qualified for position)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(candidate, be interested in position) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(candidate, be interested in position) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(candidate, be interested in position)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(candidate, be interested in position) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(candidate, be interested in position)