candidate: be suitable for position

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents political party
Weight: 0.68
, person
Weight: 0.60
, individual
Weight: 0.60
, activist
Weight: 0.57
Siblings third party
Weight: 0.69
, general election
Weight: 0.65
, congressman
Weight: 0.63
, democrat
Weight: 0.63
, libertarian
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be suitable for position 1.00
be qualified for position 0.83
be interested in position 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(candidate, be suitable for position) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(candidate, be suitable for position)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(candidate, be suitable for position) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(candidate, be qualified for position)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(candidate, be suitable for position) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(candidate, be interested in position)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(candidate, be suitable for position) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(candidate, be interested in position)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(candidate, be suitable for position) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(candidate, be interested in position)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(candidate, be suitable for position) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(candidate, be interested in position)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(candidate, be suitable for position) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(candidate, be qualified for position)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(candidate, be suitable for position) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(candidate, be qualified for position)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(candidate, be suitable for position) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(candidate, be qualified for position)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(candidate, be suitable for position) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(candidate, be suitable for position) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(candidate, be suitable for position)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(candidate, be suitable for position) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(candidate, be suitable for position)