candy bar: be at drive-in movie

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents junk food
Weight: 0.73
, snack
Weight: 0.73
, food
Weight: 0.68
, item
Weight: 0.67
Siblings chocolate bar
Weight: 0.40
, candy
Weight: 0.38
, soda pop
Weight: 0.38
, cotton candy
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at movie 1.00
be at drive-in movie 1.00
be at theater 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(snack, be at movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(candy bar, be at drive-in movie)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(candy bar, be at drive-in movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(snack, be at movie)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(candy bar, be at drive-in movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(snack, be at movie)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(candy bar, be at drive-in movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(soda pop, be at drive-in movie)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(candy bar, be at drive-in movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(candy, be at drive-in movie)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(candy bar, be at drive-in movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(candy, be at movie)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(candy bar, be at drive-in movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(candy, be at theater)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(snack, be at movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(candy bar, be at drive-in movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(candy bar, be at drive-in movie)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(candy bar, be at drive-in movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(soda pop, be at drive-in movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(soda pop, be at drive-in movie)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(candy bar, be at drive-in movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(candy, be at movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(candy, be at movie)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(candy bar, be at drive-in movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(candy, be at drive-in movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(candy, be at drive-in movie)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(candy bar, be at drive-in movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(candy, be at theater) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(candy, be at theater)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(candy bar, be at drive-in movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(candy bar, be at drive-in movie)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(candy bar, be at drive-in movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(candy bar, be at theater)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(candy bar, be at drive-in movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(candy bar, be at theater)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(candy bar, be at drive-in movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(candy bar, be at theater)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(candy bar, be at drive-in movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(candy bar, be at theater)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(candy bar, be at drive-in movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(candy bar, be at drive-in movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(candy bar, be at drive-in movie)

Typical implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(candy bar, be at drive-in movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(candy bar, be at drive-in movie)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(candy bar, be at drive-in movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(snack, be at movie)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(candy bar, be at drive-in movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(candy, be at movie)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(candy bar, be at drive-in movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(candy, be at drive-in movie)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(candy bar, be at drive-in movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(soda pop, be at drive-in movie)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(candy bar, be at drive-in movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(candy, be at theater)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(candy bar, be at drive-in movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(snack, be at movie)