candy: is harmful

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents gift
Weight: 0.69
, refined sugar
Weight: 0.67
, item
Weight: 0.61
, snack
Weight: 0.61
Siblings milk chocolate
Weight: 0.77
, cotton candy
Weight: 0.69
, gum
Weight: 0.68
, rock candy
Weight: 0.67
, toffee
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
is harmful 1.00
be potentially harmful to teeth 0.84
is unhealthy 0.79
be identified as toxic inhalation hazard 0.76
be dangerous to body 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(refined sugar, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(candy, is harmful)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(refined sugar, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(candy, is harmful)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(candy, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(refined sugar, is harmful)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(candy, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(refined sugar, is unhealthy)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(candy, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(refined sugar, is unhealthy)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(candy, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(refined sugar, is harmful)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(candy, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(gum, is unhealthy)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(refined sugar, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(candy, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(candy, is harmful)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(refined sugar, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(candy, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(candy, is harmful)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(candy, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(gum, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(gum, is unhealthy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(candy, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(candy, is harmful)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(candy, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(candy, be potentially harmful to teeth)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(candy, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(candy, be potentially harmful to teeth)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(candy, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(candy, be potentially harmful to teeth)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(candy, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(candy, be dangerous to body)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(candy, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(candy, be dangerous to body)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(candy, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(candy, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(candy, is harmful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(candy, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(candy, is harmful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(candy, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(refined sugar, is harmful)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(candy, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(refined sugar, is unhealthy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(candy, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(gum, is unhealthy)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(candy, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(refined sugar, is harmful)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(candy, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(refined sugar, is unhealthy)