canned food: be bad for dogs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food
Weight: 0.69
, item
Weight: 0.68
, staple
Weight: 0.65
, donation
Weight: 0.63
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings pet food
Weight: 0.40
, fresh food
Weight: 0.40
, fast food
Weight: 0.39
, junk food
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for dogs 1.00
go bad 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(food, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(canned food, be bad for dogs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(canned food, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(food, go bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(canned food, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(food, go bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(canned food, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(pet food, go bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(food, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(canned food, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(canned food, be bad for dogs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(canned food, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(pet food, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(pet food, go bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(canned food, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(canned food, be bad for dogs)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(canned food, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(canned food, go bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(canned food, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(canned food, go bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(canned food, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(canned food, go bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(canned food, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(canned food, go bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(canned food, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(canned food, go bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(canned food, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(canned food, go bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(canned food, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(canned food, go bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(canned food, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(canned food, go bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(canned food, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(canned food, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(canned food, be bad for dogs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(canned food, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(canned food, be bad for dogs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(canned food, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(food, go bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(canned food, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(pet food, go bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(canned food, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(food, go bad)