cap: be considered yelling

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents proposal
Weight: 0.62
, legislation
Weight: 0.61
, device
Weight: 0.59
, time
Weight: 0.58
, part
Weight: 0.58
Siblings bill
Weight: 0.32
, helmet
Weight: 0.32
, amendment
Weight: 0.32
, free time
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered yelling 1.00
be considered screaming 0.90
be parallel shouting 0.83
come off yells 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(cap, be considered yelling)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(cap, be considered yelling)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(cap, be considered yelling)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(cap, be considered screaming)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(cap, be considered yelling)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(cap, be considered screaming)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(cap, be considered yelling)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(cap, come off yells)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(cap, be considered yelling)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(cap, come off yells)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(cap, be considered yelling)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(cap, come off yells)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(cap, be considered yelling)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(cap, be parallel shouting)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(cap, be considered yelling)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(cap, be considered screaming)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(cap, be considered yelling)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(cap, come off yells)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(cap, be considered yelling)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(cap, be parallel shouting)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(cap, be considered yelling)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(cap, be considered screaming)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(cap, be considered yelling)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cap, be parallel shouting)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(cap, be considered yelling)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(cap, be parallel shouting)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(cap, be considered yelling)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(cap, be considered yelling)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(cap, be considered yelling)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(cap, be considered yelling)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(cap, be considered yelling)