capacity: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents facility
Weight: 0.68
, value
Weight: 0.64
, quality
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.60
Siblings liter
Weight: 0.55
, power plant
Weight: 0.35
, nuclear power plant
Weight: 0.34
, power line
Weight: 0.33
, throughput
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality system 0.84
be good for environment 0.80
be bad for environment 0.77
be better than quantity 0.77
has quality definition 0.76
be bad on snapchat 0.76
be bad on instagram 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(quality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(capacity, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(quality, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(capacity, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(quality, be better than quantity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(capacity, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(quality, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(capacity, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(quality, be bad on snapchat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(capacity, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(quality, be bad on instagram) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(capacity, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(quality, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(quality, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(quality, has quality system)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(quality, be bad on instagram)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(quality, be bad on snapchat)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(quality, be better than quantity)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(quality, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(quality, be bad on instagram)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(quality, be bad on snapchat)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(quality, be better than quantity)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(quality, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(quality, has quality system)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(liter, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(power line, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be bad for environment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be bad for environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(power plant, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(power line, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(throughput, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be good for environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be good for environment)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(throughput, has quality definition)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(quality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(capacity, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(quality, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(capacity, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(quality, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(capacity, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(quality, be better than quantity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(capacity, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(quality, be bad on snapchat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(capacity, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(quality, be bad on instagram) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(capacity, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(throughput, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(throughput, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(power line, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(power line, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(power plant, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(power plant, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(nuclear power plant, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(nuclear power plant, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(liter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(liter, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(power line, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(power line, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(power plant, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(power plant, be good for environment)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, be good for environment)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, be bad for environment)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(throughput, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(throughput, has quality definition)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(power plant, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(power plant, be bad for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(capacity, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(capacity, has quality bad)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(capacity, has quality bad)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(capacity, has quality bad)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(capacity, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(capacity, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(capacity, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(quality, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(quality, has quality system)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(quality, be bad on instagram)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(quality, be bad on snapchat)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(quality, be better than quantity)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(quality, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(liter, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be bad for environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(power line, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(power plant, be bad for environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(throughput, has quality definition)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(throughput, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(power line, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be good for environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(power plant, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(power plant, be good for environment)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(quality, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(quality, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(quality, has quality system)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(quality, be better than quantity)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(quality, be bad on instagram)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(capacity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(quality, be bad on snapchat)