card: be more than one card

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents credit card
Weight: 0.78
, debit card
Weight: 0.71
, business card
Weight: 0.66
, type
Weight: 0.58
Siblings wild card
Weight: 0.77
, visa card
Weight: 0.68
, index card
Weight: 0.65
, payment
Weight: 0.63
, id
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more than one card 1.00
be at card catalogue 0.86
be at card game 0.83
be used to than you have 0.82
be used to play card game 0.80
be store in card case 0.80
be more expensive than breadbox 0.76
be at card slot 0.76
be hard than use computer 0.76
be motivated by it be fast than write 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(debit card, be used to than you have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(card, be more than one card)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(type, be hard than use computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(card, be more than one card)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(type, be motivated by it be fast than write) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(card, be more than one card)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(credit card, be more expensive than breadbox) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(card, be more than one card)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(card, be more than one card) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(credit card, be more expensive than breadbox)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(card, be more than one card) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(type, be motivated by it be fast than write)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(card, be more than one card) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(debit card, be used to than you have)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(card, be more than one card) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(type, be hard than use computer)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(card, be more than one card) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(credit card, be more expensive than breadbox)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(card, be more than one card) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(debit card, be used to than you have)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(card, be more than one card) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(type, be hard than use computer)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(card, be more than one card) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(type, be motivated by it be fast than write)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(card, be more than one card) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(index card, be at card catalogue)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(card, be more than one card) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(visa card, be at card slot)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(card, be more than one card) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(index card, be store in card case)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(debit card, be used to than you have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(card, be more than one card) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(card, be more than one card)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(type, be hard than use computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(card, be more than one card) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(card, be more than one card)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(type, be motivated by it be fast than write) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(card, be more than one card) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(card, be more than one card)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(credit card, be more expensive than breadbox) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(card, be more than one card) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(card, be more than one card)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(card, be more than one card) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(index card, be at card catalogue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(index card, be at card catalogue)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(card, be more than one card) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(index card, be store in card case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(index card, be store in card case)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(card, be more than one card) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(visa card, be at card slot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(visa card, be at card slot)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(card, be more than one card) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(card, be more than one card)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(card, be more than one card) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(card, be at card game)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(card, be more than one card) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(card, be at card game)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(card, be more than one card) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(card, be used to play card game)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(card, be more than one card) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(card, be used to play card game)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(card, be more than one card) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(card, be at card game)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(card, be more than one card) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(card, be used to play card game)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(card, be more than one card) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(card, be at card game)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(card, be more than one card) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(card, be used to play card game)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(card, be more than one card) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(card, be more than one card) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(card, be more than one card)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(card, be more than one card) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(card, be more than one card)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(card, be more than one card) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(debit card, be used to than you have)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(card, be more than one card) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(type, be hard than use computer)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(card, be more than one card) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(type, be motivated by it be fast than write)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(card, be more than one card) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(credit card, be more expensive than breadbox)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(card, be more than one card) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(index card, be at card catalogue)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(card, be more than one card) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(index card, be store in card case)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(card, be more than one card) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(visa card, be at card slot)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(card, be more than one card) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(debit card, be used to than you have)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(card, be more than one card) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(type, be hard than use computer)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(card, be more than one card) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(type, be motivated by it be fast than write)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(card, be more than one card) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(credit card, be more expensive than breadbox)