cardboard: is bad insulator

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cardboard box
Weight: 0.72
, metal
Weight: 0.60
, item
Weight: 0.59
, material
Weight: 0.58
, raw material
Weight: 0.58
Siblings styrofoam
Weight: 0.35
, plastic wrap
Weight: 0.34
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.34
, paper towel
Weight: 0.34
, burlap
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is bad insulator 1.00
is good insulator 0.99
is insulator 0.98

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, is good insulator)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, is bad insulator)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is good insulator)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, is good insulator)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, is insulator)
...

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(cardboard, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(aluminum foil, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, is insulator)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(cardboard, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(styrofoam, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, is insulator)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(cardboard, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(aluminum foil, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, is bad insulator)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(cardboard, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, is good insulator)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(cardboard, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(plastic wrap, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(plastic wrap, is insulator)
...

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(cardboard, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(cardboard, is bad insulator)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(cardboard, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(cardboard, is insulator)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(cardboard, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(cardboard, is good insulator)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(cardboard, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(cardboard, is insulator)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(cardboard, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(cardboard, is good insulator)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(cardboard, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(cardboard, is insulator)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(cardboard, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(cardboard, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, is bad insulator)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(cardboard, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(cardboard, is bad insulator)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, is insulator)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(styrofoam, is insulator)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(paper towel, is insulator)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(plastic wrap, is insulator)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(styrofoam, is good insulator)
...