cardinal: be elected to conclave

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bird
Weight: 0.64
, man
Weight: 0.61
, bishop
Weight: 0.58
, species
Weight: 0.55
, pope
Weight: 0.54
Siblings priest
Weight: 0.35
, catholic priest
Weight: 0.35
, golden eagle
Weight: 0.33
, peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be elected to conclave 1.00
elected pope 0.81
elect pope 0.80
be called cardinals 0.78
is then cardinals 0.78
is cardinals 0.78
is female cardinals 0.77
is then female cardinals 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(cardinal, be elected to conclave)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(catholic priest, be called cardinals)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(cardinal, be elected to conclave)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(catholic priest, be called cardinals)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(catholic priest, be called cardinals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(cardinal, be elected to conclave)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(cardinal, be elected to conclave)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(cardinal, be elected to conclave)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(cardinal, is cardinals)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(cardinal, be elected to conclave)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(cardinal, be called cardinals)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(cardinal, be elected to conclave)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(cardinal, elected pope)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(cardinal, be elected to conclave)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(cardinal, elected pope)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(cardinal, be elected to conclave)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(cardinal, is cardinals)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(cardinal, be elected to conclave)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(cardinal, elected pope)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(cardinal, be elected to conclave)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(cardinal, elected pope)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(cardinal, be elected to conclave)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(cardinal, be called cardinals)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(cardinal, be elected to conclave)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(cardinal, elect pope)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(cardinal, be elected to conclave)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(cardinal, be called cardinals)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(cardinal, be elected to conclave)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(cardinal, elect pope)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(cardinal, be elected to conclave)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(cardinal, elect pope)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(cardinal, be elected to conclave)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(cardinal, elect pope)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(cardinal, be elected to conclave)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(cardinal, is cardinals)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(cardinal, be elected to conclave)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(cardinal, be called cardinals)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(cardinal, be elected to conclave)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(cardinal, is cardinals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(cardinal, be elected to conclave)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(cardinal, be elected to conclave)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(cardinal, be elected to conclave)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(cardinal, be elected to conclave)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(cardinal, be elected to conclave)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(cardinal, be elected to conclave)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(catholic priest, be called cardinals)