carnivore: be called carnivores

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.63
, species
Weight: 0.56
, predator
Weight: 0.56
, technology
Weight: 0.53
Siblings grizzly bear
Weight: 0.73
, snow leopard
Weight: 0.67
, coyote
Weight: 0.67
, bear
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called carnivores 1.00
is carnivores 0.99
be different than carnivores 0.95
is carnivore 0.86
eat herbivores 0.82
is omnivores 0.82
be like omnivores 0.81
be smaller than herbivores 0.79
is meat eaters 0.77
be more attractive than herbivores 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, be called carnivores)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(grizzly bear, is omnivores)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(carnivore, be called carnivores)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(grizzly bear, is omnivores)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(grizzly bear, is omnivores)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(carnivore, be called carnivores)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(carnivore, be called carnivores)

Similarity expansion

0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(carnivore, be called carnivores)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(carnivore, is carnivores)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(carnivore, be called carnivores)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(carnivore, is carnivores)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(carnivore, be called carnivores)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(carnivore, is carnivores)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(carnivore, be called carnivores)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(carnivore, is carnivore)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(carnivore, be called carnivores)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, is carnivores)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(carnivore, be called carnivores)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, be different than carnivores)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(carnivore, be called carnivores)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(carnivore, be different than carnivores)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(carnivore, be called carnivores)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(carnivore, is carnivore)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(carnivore, be called carnivores)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(carnivore, be different than carnivores)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(carnivore, be called carnivores)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, is omnivores)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(carnivore, be called carnivores)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(carnivore, is carnivore)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(carnivore, be called carnivores)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(carnivore, is omnivores)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(carnivore, be called carnivores)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(carnivore, be different than carnivores)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(carnivore, be called carnivores)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(carnivore, eat herbivores)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(carnivore, be called carnivores)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, be like omnivores)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(carnivore, be called carnivores)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, eat herbivores)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(carnivore, be called carnivores)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, is carnivore)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(carnivore, be called carnivores)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, be smaller than herbivores)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(carnivore, be called carnivores)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(carnivore, is omnivores)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(carnivore, be called carnivores)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(carnivore, eat herbivores)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(carnivore, be called carnivores)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(carnivore, be like omnivores)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(carnivore, be called carnivores)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(carnivore, eat herbivores)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(carnivore, be called carnivores)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, is meat eaters)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(carnivore, be called carnivores)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, be more attractive than herbivores)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(carnivore, be called carnivores)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(carnivore, be smaller than herbivores)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(carnivore, be called carnivores)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(carnivore, is meat eaters)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(carnivore, be called carnivores)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(carnivore, be more attractive than herbivores)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(carnivore, be called carnivores)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(carnivore, is omnivores)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(carnivore, be called carnivores)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(carnivore, be like omnivores)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(carnivore, be called carnivores)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(carnivore, be smaller than herbivores)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(carnivore, be called carnivores)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(carnivore, is meat eaters)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(carnivore, be called carnivores)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(carnivore, be more attractive than herbivores)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(carnivore, be called carnivores)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(carnivore, is meat eaters)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(carnivore, be called carnivores)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(carnivore, be like omnivores)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(carnivore, be called carnivores)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(carnivore, be smaller than herbivores)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(carnivore, be called carnivores)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(carnivore, be more attractive than herbivores)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(carnivore, be called carnivores)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(carnivore, be called carnivores)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, be called carnivores)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(carnivore, be called carnivores)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(carnivore, be called carnivores)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, be called carnivores)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(grizzly bear, is omnivores)