carnivore: is meat eaters

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.63
, species
Weight: 0.56
, predator
Weight: 0.56
, technology
Weight: 0.53
Siblings grizzly bear
Weight: 0.73
, snow leopard
Weight: 0.67
, coyote
Weight: 0.67
, bear
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
is meat eaters 1.00
eat meat 0.90
eat raw meat 0.87
need meat 0.86
eat 0.79
eat eggs 0.78
have eat 0.77
be called carnivores 0.77
is carnivores 0.77
is omnivores 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(predator, eat)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(carnivore, is meat eaters)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(predator, eat raw meat)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(carnivore, is meat eaters)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(predator, eat raw meat)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(predator, eat)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(predator, eat raw meat)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(predator, eat)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(snow leopard, eat meat)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(coyote, eat meat)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(bear, eat meat)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(coyote, eat)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(grizzly bear, is omnivores)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(predator, eat raw meat)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(carnivore, is meat eaters)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(predator, eat)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(carnivore, is meat eaters)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(snow leopard, eat meat)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(snow leopard, eat meat)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(coyote, eat meat)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(coyote, eat meat)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(bear, eat meat)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(bear, eat meat)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(coyote, eat)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(coyote, eat)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(grizzly bear, is omnivores)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(grizzly bear, is omnivores)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(carnivore, is meat eaters)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(carnivore, eat meat)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(carnivore, eat meat)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(carnivore, eat meat)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, eat meat)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(carnivore, eat meat)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, eat meat)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(carnivore, eat raw meat)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, eat raw meat)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(carnivore, eat raw meat)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(carnivore, eat meat)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(carnivore, eat meat)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(carnivore, need meat)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(carnivore, is carnivores)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(carnivore, eat eggs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(carnivore, eat eggs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, eat eggs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(carnivore, eat raw meat)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(carnivore, need meat)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(carnivore, eat)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(carnivore, is carnivores)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(carnivore, need meat)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(carnivore, is omnivores)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(carnivore, eat eggs)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, eat)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, is omnivores)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(carnivore, eat)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(carnivore, is omnivores)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(carnivore, eat)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(carnivore, is carnivores)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(carnivore, is omnivores)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(carnivore, have eat)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, have eat)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(carnivore, be called carnivores)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, need meat)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(carnivore, have eat)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(carnivore, have eat)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(carnivore, be called carnivores)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(carnivore, be called carnivores)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, be called carnivores)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, is carnivores)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, is meat eaters)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(carnivore, is meat eaters)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(predator, eat raw meat)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(predator, eat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(snow leopard, eat meat)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(coyote, eat meat)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(bear, eat meat)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(coyote, eat)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(grizzly bear, is omnivores)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(predator, eat raw meat)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(carnivore, is meat eaters)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(predator, eat)