carpet: has state wet

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.65
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, option
Weight: 0.56
, item
Weight: 0.55
, furniture
Weight: 0.55
Siblings berber
Weight: 0.50
, flooring
Weight: 0.35
, linoleum
Weight: 0.35
, paper towel
Weight: 0.34
, rug
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state wet 1.00
has state damp 0.87
be wet under right front passenger mat 0.79
be wet under front passenger mat 0.79
feel damp 0.79
is cold 0.76
is wet todd 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(carpet, has state wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(rug, is wet todd)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(carpet, has state wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(rug, is wet todd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(rug, is wet todd)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(carpet, has state wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(carpet, has state wet)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(carpet, has state wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(carpet, be wet under right front passenger mat)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(carpet, has state wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(carpet, be wet under right front passenger mat)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(carpet, has state wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(carpet, be wet under right front passenger mat)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(carpet, has state wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(carpet, is wet todd)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(carpet, has state wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(carpet, be wet under right front passenger mat)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(carpet, has state wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(carpet, has state damp)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(carpet, has state wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(carpet, is wet todd)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(carpet, has state wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(carpet, is wet todd)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(carpet, has state wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(carpet, has state damp)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(carpet, has state wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(carpet, feel damp)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(carpet, has state wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(carpet, is wet todd)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(carpet, has state wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(carpet, has state damp)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(carpet, has state wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(carpet, feel damp)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(carpet, has state wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(carpet, has state damp)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(carpet, has state wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(carpet, feel damp)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(carpet, has state wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(carpet, feel damp)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(carpet, has state wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(carpet, is cold)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(carpet, has state wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(carpet, is cold)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(carpet, has state wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(carpet, is cold)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(carpet, has state wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(carpet, is cold)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(carpet, has state wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(carpet, has state wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(carpet, has state wet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(carpet, has state wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(carpet, has state wet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(carpet, has state wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(rug, is wet todd)