cash: be better than credit cards

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents debit card
Weight: 0.61
, form
Weight: 0.59
, information
Weight: 0.59
, investment
Weight: 0.59
, gift
Weight: 0.58
Siblings savings account
Weight: 0.33
, financial
Weight: 0.32
, smart card
Weight: 0.32
, stock
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than credit cards 1.00
be with credit cards 0.96
be better than credit 0.93
be better than bitcoin 0.79
be credit in accounting 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(debit card, be better than credit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(cash, be better than credit cards)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(cash, be better than credit cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(debit card, be better than credit)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(cash, be better than credit cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(debit card, be better than credit)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(debit card, be better than credit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(cash, be better than credit cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(cash, be better than credit cards)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(cash, be better than credit cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(cash, be better than credit cards)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(cash, be better than credit cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(cash, be with credit cards)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(cash, be better than credit cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(cash, be better than credit)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(cash, be better than credit cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(cash, be with credit cards)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(cash, be better than credit cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(cash, be with credit cards)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(cash, be better than credit cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(cash, be better than credit)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(cash, be better than credit cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(cash, be with credit cards)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(cash, be better than credit cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(cash, be better than credit)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(cash, be better than credit cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(cash, be better than bitcoin)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(cash, be better than credit cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(cash, be credit in accounting)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(cash, be better than credit cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(cash, be credit in accounting)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(cash, be better than credit cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(cash, be better than credit)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(cash, be better than credit cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(cash, be better than bitcoin)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(cash, be better than credit cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(cash, be better than bitcoin)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(cash, be better than credit cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(cash, be better than bitcoin)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(cash, be better than credit cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(cash, be credit in accounting)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(cash, be better than credit cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(cash, be credit in accounting)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(cash, be better than credit cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(cash, be better than credit cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(cash, be better than credit cards)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(cash, be better than credit cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(cash, be better than credit cards)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(cash, be better than credit cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(debit card, be better than credit)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(cash, be better than credit cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(debit card, be better than credit)