cashew: be bad for us

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crop
Weight: 0.67
, food
Weight: 0.55
, product
Weight: 0.55
, nut
Weight: 0.48
, plantation
Weight: 0.47
Siblings cassava
Weight: 0.37
, banana
Weight: 0.36
, paddy
Weight: 0.36
, pineapple
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for us 1.00
be bad for dogs 0.79
be good for body 0.77
be bad for blood type o 0.76
has quality good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(cashew, be bad for us)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(nut, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(cashew, be bad for us)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(nut, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(cashew, be bad for us)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(cashew, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(nut, be bad for dogs)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(cashew, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(nut, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(cashew, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(food, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(cashew, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(nut, be bad for dogs)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(cashew, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(nut, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(cashew, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(cashew, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(banana, be bad for dogs)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(cashew, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(pineapple, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(cashew, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(banana, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(cashew, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(cashew, be bad for us)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(nut, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(cashew, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(cashew, be bad for us)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(nut, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(cashew, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(cashew, be bad for us)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(cashew, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(banana, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(banana, be bad for dogs)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(cashew, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(banana, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(banana, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(cashew, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(pineapple, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(pineapple, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(cashew, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(cashew, be bad for us)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(cashew, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(cashew, be bad for dogs)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(cashew, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(cashew, be bad for dogs)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(cashew, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(cashew, be bad for dogs)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(cashew, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(cashew, be bad for dogs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(cashew, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(cashew, be bad for blood type o)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(cashew, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(cashew, be bad for blood type o)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(cashew, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(cashew, be bad for blood type o)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(cashew, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(cashew, be good for body)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(cashew, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(cashew, has quality good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(cashew, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(cashew, be bad for blood type o)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(cashew, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(cashew, be good for body)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(cashew, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(cashew, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(cashew, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(cashew, be good for body)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(cashew, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(cashew, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(cashew, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(cashew, be good for body)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(cashew, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(cashew, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(cashew, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(cashew, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(cashew, be bad for us)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(cashew, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(cashew, be bad for us)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(cashew, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(nut, be bad for dogs)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(cashew, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(nut, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(cashew, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(cashew, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(banana, be bad for dogs)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(cashew, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(banana, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(cashew, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(pineapple, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(cashew, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(nut, be bad for dogs)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(cashew, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(nut, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(cashew, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)