cashier: defend themselves from would-be robber

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents job
Weight: 0.60
, cash
Weight: 0.56
, people
Weight: 0.55
, customer
Weight: 0.55
, grocery store
Weight: 0.54
Siblings clerk
Weight: 0.35
, convenience store
Weight: 0.35
, waiter
Weight: 0.34
, supermarket
Weight: 0.34
, food store
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
defend themselves from would-be robber 1.00
be used to rob for money 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(cashier, defend themselves from would-be robber)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(food store, be used to rob for money)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(cashier, defend themselves from would-be robber)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(food store, be used to rob for money)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(food store, be used to rob for money)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(cashier, defend themselves from would-be robber)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(cashier, defend themselves from would-be robber)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(cashier, defend themselves from would-be robber)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(cashier, defend themselves from would-be robber)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(cashier, defend themselves from would-be robber)

Typical implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(cashier, defend themselves from would-be robber)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(cashier, defend themselves from would-be robber)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(cashier, defend themselves from would-be robber)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(food store, be used to rob for money)