cashier: get paid

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents job
Weight: 0.60
, position
Weight: 0.56
, occupation
Weight: 0.56
, cash
Weight: 0.56
, customer
Weight: 0.55
Siblings clerk
Weight: 0.35
, waiter
Weight: 0.34
, janitor
Weight: 0.34
, receptionist
Weight: 0.33
, bartender
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
get paid 1.00
get paid little 0.93
is pay 0.88
pay 0.88
have get 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(cashier, get paid)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(janitor, get paid)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cashier, get paid)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(janitor, get paid)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(janitor, get paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cashier, get paid)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(cashier, get paid)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(cashier, get paid)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(cashier, get paid little)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(cashier, get paid)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(cashier, get paid little)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(cashier, get paid)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(cashier, pay)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(cashier, get paid)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(cashier, pay)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cashier, get paid)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(cashier, get paid little)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cashier, get paid)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(cashier, pay)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(cashier, get paid)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(cashier, is pay)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(cashier, get paid)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(cashier, is pay)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(cashier, get paid)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(cashier, have get)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cashier, get paid)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(cashier, is pay)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cashier, get paid)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(cashier, have get)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(cashier, get paid)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(cashier, have get)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(cashier, get paid)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(cashier, get paid little)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(cashier, get paid)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(cashier, is pay)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(cashier, get paid)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(cashier, pay)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(cashier, get paid)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(cashier, have get)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(cashier, get paid)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(cashier, get paid)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(cashier, get paid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cashier, get paid)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(cashier, get paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(cashier, get paid)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(janitor, get paid)