castle: were needed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.65
, landmark
Weight: 0.64
, historical site
Weight: 0.64
, architecture
Weight: 0.61
Siblings buckingham palace
Weight: 0.36
, westminster abbey
Weight: 0.36
, palace
Weight: 0.36
, fortress
Weight: 0.35
, lighthouse
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
were needed 1.00
is needed 0.93
were needed in times 0.92
were necessary 0.90
were needed in imes 0.87
were used for defence 0.86
were important in 1870 0.85
were needed in ages 0.84
were attaked 0.83
were ataked 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(architecture, is needed)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(castle, were needed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(castle, were needed)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(architecture, is needed)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(castle, were needed)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(architecture, is needed)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(castle, were needed)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(lighthouse, were important in 1870)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(architecture, is needed)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(castle, were needed)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(castle, were needed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(castle, were needed)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(lighthouse, were important in 1870)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(lighthouse, were important in 1870)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(castle, were needed)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(castle, were needed)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(castle, were needed)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(castle, were necessary)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(castle, were needed)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(castle, were necessary)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(castle, were needed)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(castle, were ataked)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(castle, were needed)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(castle, were necessary)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(castle, were needed)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(castle, were ataked)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(castle, were needed)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(castle, were attaked)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(castle, were needed)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(castle, were ataked)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(castle, were needed)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(castle, were ataked)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(castle, were needed)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(castle, were attaked)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(castle, were needed)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(castle, were attaked)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(castle, were needed)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(castle, were necessary)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(castle, were needed)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(castle, were attaked)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(castle, were needed)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(castle, were needed)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(castle, were needed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(castle, were needed)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(castle, were needed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(castle, were needed)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(architecture, is needed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(castle, were needed)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(lighthouse, were important in 1870)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(castle, were needed)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(architecture, is needed)