castle: were well protected

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.65
, landmark
Weight: 0.64
, historical site
Weight: 0.64
, architecture
Weight: 0.61
Siblings buckingham palace
Weight: 0.36
, westminster abbey
Weight: 0.36
, palace
Weight: 0.36
, fortress
Weight: 0.35
, lighthouse
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
were well protected 1.00
were protected 0.95
were in ages protected 0.84
were in middle ages protected 0.82
were important in 1870 0.78
protect people 0.77
being are built 0.77
were used for defence 0.77
were built in certain places 0.77
were where 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(castle, were well protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(lighthouse, were important in 1870)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(castle, were well protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(lighthouse, were important in 1870) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(lighthouse, were important in 1870)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(castle, were well protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(castle, were well protected)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(castle, were well protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(castle, were protected)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(castle, were well protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(castle, were protected)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(castle, were well protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(castle, were protected)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(castle, were well protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(castle, were protected)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(castle, were well protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(castle, protect people)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(castle, were well protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(castle, protect people)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(castle, were well protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(castle, protect people)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(castle, were well protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(castle, protect people)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(castle, were well protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(castle, were well protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(castle, were well protected)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(castle, were well protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(castle, were well protected)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(castle, were well protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(lighthouse, were important in 1870)