cataract: be rectified

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents complication
Weight: 0.66
, surgical procedure
Weight: 0.66
, problem
Weight: 0.60
, condition
Weight: 0.60
, disease
Weight: 0.59
Siblings glaucoma
Weight: 0.36
, plastic surgery
Weight: 0.36
, liver cancer
Weight: 0.35
, hysterectomy
Weight: 0.35
, tonsillectomy
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be rectified 1.00
be corrected 0.86
were solved then 0.79
were solved 0.79
were solved back 0.79
be corrected with glasses 0.78
were solved back then 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(problem, were solved back then) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(cataract, be rectified)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(cataract, be rectified) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(problem, were solved back then)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(cataract, be rectified) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(problem, were solved back then)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(problem, were solved back then) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(cataract, be rectified) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(cataract, be rectified)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(cataract, be rectified) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(cataract, be rectified)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(cataract, be rectified) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(cataract, be corrected)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(cataract, be rectified) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(cataract, be corrected)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(cataract, be rectified) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(cataract, be corrected with glasses)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(cataract, be rectified) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(cataract, be corrected)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(cataract, be rectified) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(cataract, be corrected with glasses)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(cataract, be rectified) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(cataract, be rectified) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(cataract, be rectified)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(cataract, be rectified) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(cataract, be rectified)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(cataract, be rectified) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(problem, were solved back then)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(cataract, be rectified) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(problem, were solved back then)