catcher: is bad hitters

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents infielder
Weight: 0.58
, pitch
Weight: 0.56
, position
Weight: 0.56
, need
Weight: 0.53
Siblings first baseman
Weight: 0.65
, shortstop
Weight: 0.36
, pitcher
Weight: 0.35
, quarterback
Weight: 0.33
, linebacker
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is bad hitters 1.00
is good hitters 0.99
is hitters 0.98
is poor hitters 0.97
is horrible hitters 0.97
throw at hitters 0.95
is bad batters 0.86
talk to pitchers 0.86
is terrible batters 0.85
throw at batters 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(catcher, is bad hitters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(pitcher, is bad hitters)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(catcher, is bad hitters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pitcher, is good hitters)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(catcher, is bad hitters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(shortstop, is bad hitters)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(catcher, is bad hitters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(pitcher, is bad batters)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(catcher, is bad hitters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(pitcher, is terrible batters)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(catcher, is bad hitters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(shortstop, is hitters)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(catcher, is bad hitters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(shortstop, is bad hitters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(shortstop, is bad hitters)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(catcher, is bad hitters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(pitcher, is bad hitters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(pitcher, is bad hitters)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(catcher, is bad hitters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(pitcher, is good hitters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(pitcher, is good hitters)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(catcher, is bad hitters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(shortstop, is hitters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(shortstop, is hitters)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(catcher, is bad hitters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(pitcher, is bad batters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(pitcher, is bad batters)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(catcher, is bad hitters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(pitcher, is terrible batters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(pitcher, is terrible batters)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(catcher, is bad hitters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(catcher, is bad hitters)

Similarity expansion

0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(catcher, is bad hitters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(catcher, is good hitters)
0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(catcher, is bad hitters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(catcher, is good hitters)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(catcher, is bad hitters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(catcher, is good hitters)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(catcher, is bad hitters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(catcher, talk to pitchers)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(catcher, is bad hitters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(catcher, talk to pitchers)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(catcher, is bad hitters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(catcher, talk to pitchers)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(catcher, is bad hitters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(catcher, is good hitters)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(catcher, is bad hitters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(catcher, talk to pitchers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(catcher, is bad hitters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(catcher, is bad hitters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(catcher, is bad hitters)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(catcher, is bad hitters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(catcher, is bad hitters)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(catcher, is bad hitters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(shortstop, is hitters)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(catcher, is bad hitters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(shortstop, is bad hitters)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(catcher, is bad hitters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(pitcher, is bad hitters)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(catcher, is bad hitters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(pitcher, is good hitters)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(catcher, is bad hitters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(pitcher, is bad batters)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(catcher, is bad hitters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(pitcher, is terrible batters)