catfish: be at river

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fish
Weight: 0.72
, item
Weight: 0.61
, animal
Weight: 0.61
, salt water
Weight: 0.59
, predator
Weight: 0.53
Siblings trout
Weight: 0.39
, chinook salmon
Weight: 0.38
, eel
Weight: 0.37
, sockeye salmon
Weight: 0.37
, salmon
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at river 1.00
be find in river 0.96
be at lake river and ocean 0.95
swim in river 0.91
requires go to river or sea 0.91
be at in lake 0.90
requires go to lake 0.87
live in lake 0.86
school in lake 0.84
requires find lake or ocean 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(fish, requires go to lake)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(catfish, be at river)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(fish, be at in lake)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(catfish, be at river)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(fish, live in lake)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(catfish, be at river)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(catfish, be at river)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(fish, be at in lake)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(catfish, be at river)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(fish, live in lake)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(catfish, be at river)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(fish, requires go to lake)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(catfish, be at river)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(fish, be at in lake)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(catfish, be at river)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(fish, requires go to lake)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(catfish, be at river)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(fish, live in lake)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(catfish, be at river)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(salmon, swim in river)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(fish, be at in lake)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(catfish, be at river)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(catfish, be at river)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(fish, requires go to lake)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(catfish, be at river)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(catfish, be at river)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(fish, live in lake)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(catfish, be at river)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(catfish, be at river)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(catfish, be at river)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(salmon, swim in river)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(salmon, swim in river)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(catfish, be at river)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(catfish, be at river)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(catfish, be at river)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(catfish, be at river)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(catfish, be at river)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(catfish, be at river)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(catfish, be at river)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(catfish, be at river)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fish, requires go to lake)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(catfish, be at river)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(fish, be at in lake)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(catfish, be at river)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fish, live in lake)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(catfish, be at river)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(salmon, swim in river)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(catfish, be at river)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fish, requires go to lake)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(catfish, be at river)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(fish, be at in lake)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(catfish, be at river)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fish, live in lake)