fish: be at in lake

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vertebrate
Weight: 0.65
, shallow water
Weight: 0.64
, creature
Weight: 0.64
, wildlife
Weight: 0.63
Siblings whale shark
Weight: 0.74
, chinook salmon
Weight: 0.73
, catfish
Weight: 0.72
, sailfish
Weight: 0.72
, seahorse
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at in lake 1.00
be at lake 0.99
requires go to lake 0.95
live in lake 0.95
be at lake river and ocean 0.94
school in lake 0.93
requires find lake or ocean 0.90
be at river 0.90
be find in river 0.88
be at pond 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(shallow water, be at lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(fish, be at in lake)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(shallow water, be at pond) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(fish, be at in lake)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(fish, be at in lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(shallow water, be at lake)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(fish, be at in lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(shallow water, be at pond)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(fish, be at in lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(shallow water, be at pond)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(fish, be at in lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(shallow water, be at lake)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(fish, be at in lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(catfish, be at river)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(fish, be at in lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(catfish, be at pond)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(shallow water, be at lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(fish, be at in lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(fish, be at in lake)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(shallow water, be at pond) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(fish, be at in lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(fish, be at in lake)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(fish, be at in lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(catfish, be at river) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(catfish, be at river)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(fish, be at in lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(catfish, be at pond) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(catfish, be at pond)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(fish, be at in lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(fish, be at in lake)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(fish, be at in lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(fish, live in lake)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(fish, be at in lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(fish, requires go to lake)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(fish, be at in lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fish, requires go to lake)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(fish, be at in lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fish, live in lake)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(fish, be at in lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(fish, requires go to lake)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(fish, be at in lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(fish, live in lake)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(fish, be at in lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(fish, live in lake)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(fish, be at in lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(fish, requires go to lake)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(fish, be at in lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(fish, be at in lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(fish, be at in lake)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(fish, be at in lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(fish, be at in lake)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(fish, be at in lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(shallow water, be at lake)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(fish, be at in lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(shallow water, be at pond)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(fish, be at in lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(catfish, be at river)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(fish, be at in lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(catfish, be at pond)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(fish, be at in lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(shallow water, be at lake)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(fish, be at in lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(shallow water, be at pond)