celebrity: get paid

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents topic
Weight: 0.59
, feature
Weight: 0.59
, character
Weight: 0.58
, person
Weight: 0.58
Siblings movie star
Weight: 0.73
, stephen hawking
Weight: 0.68
, bob hope
Weight: 0.67
, bob dylan
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
get paid 1.00
get paid for instagram 0.99
is paid 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(celebrity, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(movie star, is paid)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(celebrity, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(movie star, get paid)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(celebrity, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(movie star, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(movie star, get paid)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(celebrity, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(movie star, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(movie star, is paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(celebrity, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(celebrity, get paid)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(celebrity, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(celebrity, is paid)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(celebrity, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(celebrity, get paid for instagram)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(celebrity, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(celebrity, get paid for instagram)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(celebrity, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(celebrity, is paid)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(celebrity, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(celebrity, get paid for instagram)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(celebrity, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(celebrity, get paid for instagram)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(celebrity, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(celebrity, is paid)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(celebrity, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(celebrity, is paid)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(celebrity, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(celebrity, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(celebrity, get paid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(celebrity, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(celebrity, get paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(celebrity, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(movie star, is paid)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(celebrity, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(movie star, get paid)