movie star: is paid

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents movie
Weight: 0.74
, celebrity
Weight: 0.73
, famous person
Weight: 0.68
, film
Weight: 0.65
Siblings horror movie
Weight: 0.40
, rock star
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
is paid 1.00
be paid 0.99
get paid 0.96
get paid making 0.88
is paid obscenely 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(famous person, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(movie star, is paid)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(celebrity, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(movie star, is paid)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(celebrity, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(movie star, is paid)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(movie star, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(celebrity, is paid)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(movie star, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(celebrity, get paid)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(movie star, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(famous person, get paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(movie star, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(celebrity, is paid)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(movie star, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(famous person, get paid)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(movie star, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(celebrity, get paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(movie star, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(rock star, get paid)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(celebrity, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(movie star, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(movie star, is paid)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(famous person, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(movie star, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(movie star, is paid)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(celebrity, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(movie star, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(movie star, is paid)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(movie star, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(rock star, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(rock star, get paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(movie star, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(movie star, is paid)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(movie star, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(movie star, be paid)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(movie star, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(movie star, be paid)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(movie star, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(movie star, be paid)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(movie star, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(movie star, be paid)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(movie star, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(movie star, get paid)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(movie star, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(movie star, get paid making)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(movie star, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(movie star, get paid making)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(movie star, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(movie star, get paid making)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(movie star, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(movie star, get paid)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(movie star, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(movie star, get paid)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(movie star, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(movie star, get paid making)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(movie star, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(movie star, get paid)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(movie star, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(movie star, is paid obscenely)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(movie star, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(movie star, is paid obscenely)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(movie star, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(movie star, is paid obscenely)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(movie star, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(movie star, is paid obscenely)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(movie star, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(movie star, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(movie star, is paid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(movie star, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(movie star, is paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(movie star, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(celebrity, get paid)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(movie star, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(famous person, get paid)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(movie star, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(celebrity, is paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(movie star, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(rock star, get paid)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(movie star, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(celebrity, is paid)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(movie star, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(celebrity, get paid)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(movie star, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(famous person, get paid)