famous person: get paid

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents character
Weight: 0.57
, person
Weight: 0.57
, celebrity
Weight: 0.54
, twitter
Weight: 0.34
Siblings movie star
Weight: 0.68
, actor
Weight: 0.62
, one person
Weight: 0.38
, dead person
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
get paid 1.00
get actually paid 0.95
get money 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(celebrity, get paid)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(famous person, get paid)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(famous person, get paid)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(celebrity, get paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(famous person, get paid)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(celebrity, get paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(famous person, get paid)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(actor, get paid)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(famous person, get paid)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(movie star, get paid)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(celebrity, get paid)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(famous person, get paid)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(famous person, get paid)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(famous person, get paid)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(movie star, get paid)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(movie star, get paid)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(famous person, get paid)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(actor, get paid)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(actor, get paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(famous person, get paid)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(famous person, get paid)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(famous person, get paid)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(famous person, get actually paid)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(famous person, get paid)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(famous person, get actually paid)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(famous person, get paid)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(famous person, get money)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(famous person, get paid)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(famous person, get money)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(famous person, get paid)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(famous person, get actually paid)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(famous person, get paid)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(famous person, get money)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(famous person, get paid)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(famous person, get actually paid)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(famous person, get paid)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(famous person, get money)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(famous person, get paid)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(famous person, get paid)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(famous person, get paid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(famous person, get paid)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(famous person, get paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(famous person, get paid)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(celebrity, get paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(famous person, get paid)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(movie star, get paid)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(famous person, get paid)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(actor, get paid)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(famous person, get paid)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(celebrity, get paid)