actor: get paid

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents celebrity
Weight: 0.66
, performer
Weight: 0.64
, artist
Weight: 0.63
, famous person
Weight: 0.62
Siblings politician
Weight: 0.66
, film maker
Weight: 0.64
, villain
Weight: 0.61
, prosecutor
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
get paid 1.00
be paid 0.97
get paid day 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(famous person, get paid)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(actor, get paid)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(celebrity, get paid)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(actor, get paid)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(actor, get paid)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(celebrity, get paid)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(actor, get paid)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(famous person, get paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(actor, get paid)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(famous person, get paid)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(actor, get paid)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(celebrity, get paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(actor, get paid)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(politician, get paid)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(famous person, get paid)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(actor, get paid)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(actor, get paid)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(celebrity, get paid)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(actor, get paid)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(actor, get paid)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(actor, get paid)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(politician, get paid)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(politician, get paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(actor, get paid)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(actor, get paid)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(actor, get paid)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(actor, be paid)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(actor, get paid)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(actor, be paid)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(actor, get paid)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(actor, get paid day)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(actor, get paid)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(actor, be paid)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(actor, get paid)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(actor, get paid day)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(actor, get paid)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(actor, get paid day)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(actor, get paid)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(actor, be paid)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(actor, get paid)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(actor, get paid day)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(actor, get paid)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(actor, get paid)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(actor, get paid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(actor, get paid)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(actor, get paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(actor, get paid)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(celebrity, get paid)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(actor, get paid)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(famous person, get paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(actor, get paid)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(politician, get paid)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(actor, get paid)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(celebrity, get paid)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(actor, get paid)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(famous person, get paid)