cell phone: be related to math

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents telephone line
Weight: 0.76
, mobile phone
Weight: 0.75
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.70
, phone
Weight: 0.64
Siblings iphone
Weight: 0.69
, android
Weight: 0.64
, cellphone
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to math 1.00
be related 0.76
be related to engineering 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, be related to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(cellphone, be related)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(cell phone, be related to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(cellphone, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(cellphone, be related)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(cell phone, be related to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(cell phone, be related to math)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(cell phone, be related to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(cell phone, be related to engineering)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(cell phone, be related to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(cell phone, be related to engineering)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(cell phone, be related to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(cell phone, be related to engineering)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(cell phone, be related to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, be related to engineering)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(cell phone, be related to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(cell phone, be related to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, be related to math)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(cell phone, be related to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(cell phone, be related to math)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, be related to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(cellphone, be related)