cell phone: is most important invention ever

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents telephone line
Weight: 0.76
, mobile phone
Weight: 0.75
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.70
, phone
Weight: 0.64
Siblings iphone
Weight: 0.69
, android
Weight: 0.64
, cellphone
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
is most important invention ever 1.00
was invented 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(phone, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(cell phone, is most important invention ever)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(cell phone, is most important invention ever) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(phone, was invented)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, is most important invention ever) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(phone, was invented)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(phone, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(cell phone, is most important invention ever) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(cell phone, is most important invention ever)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(cell phone, is most important invention ever) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(cell phone, is most important invention ever)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(cell phone, is most important invention ever) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(cell phone, was invented)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(cell phone, is most important invention ever) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(cell phone, was invented)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(cell phone, is most important invention ever) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(cell phone, was invented)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(cell phone, is most important invention ever) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, was invented)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(cell phone, is most important invention ever) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(cell phone, is most important invention ever) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, is most important invention ever)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(cell phone, is most important invention ever) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(cell phone, is most important invention ever)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, is most important invention ever) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(phone, was invented)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(cell phone, is most important invention ever) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(phone, was invented)