cell phone: was invented

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents telephone line
Weight: 0.76
, mobile phone
Weight: 0.75
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.70
, phone
Weight: 0.64
Siblings iphone
Weight: 0.69
, android
Weight: 0.64
, cellphone
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
was invented 1.00
is most important invention ever 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(phone, was invented)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(cell phone, was invented)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(cell phone, was invented)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(phone, was invented)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, was invented)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(phone, was invented)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(phone, was invented)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(cell phone, was invented)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(cell phone, was invented)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(cell phone, was invented)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(cell phone, was invented)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(cell phone, was invented)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(cell phone, is most important invention ever)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(cell phone, was invented)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, is most important invention ever)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(cell phone, was invented)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(cell phone, is most important invention ever)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(cell phone, was invented)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(cell phone, is most important invention ever)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(cell phone, was invented)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(cell phone, was invented)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, was invented)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(cell phone, was invented)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(cell phone, was invented)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, was invented)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(phone, was invented)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(cell phone, was invented)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(phone, was invented)