cellphone: were needed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.71
, device
Weight: 0.65
, cell phone
Weight: 0.61
, item
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.56
Siblings cellular telephone
Weight: 0.38
, mobile phone
Weight: 0.38
, mobile
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
were needed 1.00
were really needed 0.92
were made 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(cell phone, were made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(cellphone, were needed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(cellphone, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(cell phone, were made)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(cellphone, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, were made)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(cell phone, were made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(cellphone, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(cellphone, were needed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(cellphone, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(cellphone, were needed)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(cellphone, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(cellphone, were really needed)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(cellphone, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(cellphone, were made)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(cellphone, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(cellphone, were really needed)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(cellphone, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(cellphone, were made)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(cellphone, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(cellphone, were really needed)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(cellphone, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(cellphone, were made)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(cellphone, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(cellphone, were really needed)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(cellphone, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(cellphone, were made)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(cellphone, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(cellphone, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(cellphone, were needed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(cellphone, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(cellphone, were needed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(cellphone, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(cell phone, were made)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(cellphone, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(cell phone, were made)