cellulose: be more rigid than starch

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents polymer
Weight: 0.67
, macromolecule
Weight: 0.64
, compound
Weight: 0.62
, molecule
Weight: 0.61
, filler
Weight: 0.59
Siblings ethylene oxide
Weight: 0.37
, polyethylene
Weight: 0.36
, lignin
Weight: 0.36
, resin
Weight: 0.36
, rna molecule
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more rigid than starch 1.00
be stronger than starch 0.89
be different from starch 0.88
be used by starch 0.86
is rigid 0.86
digest than starch 0.84
be stronger than amylose 0.83
be more elastic than metals 0.77
be more ductile than metals 0.76
is less reactive 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(polymer, be more ductile than metals)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(cellulose, be more rigid than starch)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(polymer, be more elastic than metals)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(cellulose, be more rigid than starch)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(cellulose, be more rigid than starch)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(polymer, be more elastic than metals)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(cellulose, be more rigid than starch)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(polymer, be more ductile than metals)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(cellulose, be more rigid than starch)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(polymer, be more ductile than metals)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(cellulose, be more rigid than starch)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(polymer, be more elastic than metals)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(polymer, be more elastic than metals)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(cellulose, be more rigid than starch)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(cellulose, be more rigid than starch)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(polymer, be more ductile than metals)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(cellulose, be more rigid than starch)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(cellulose, be more rigid than starch)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(cellulose, be more rigid than starch)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(cellulose, be more rigid than starch)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(cellulose, be more rigid than starch)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(cellulose, be used by starch)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(cellulose, be more rigid than starch)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(cellulose, is rigid)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(cellulose, be more rigid than starch)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(cellulose, be different from starch)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(cellulose, be more rigid than starch)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(cellulose, is rigid)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(cellulose, be more rigid than starch)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(cellulose, be used by starch)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(cellulose, be more rigid than starch)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(cellulose, is rigid)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(cellulose, be more rigid than starch)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(cellulose, digest than starch)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(cellulose, be more rigid than starch)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(cellulose, be stronger than starch)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(cellulose, be more rigid than starch)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(cellulose, be stronger than starch)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(cellulose, be more rigid than starch)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(cellulose, be stronger than amylose)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(cellulose, be more rigid than starch)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(cellulose, is rigid)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(cellulose, be more rigid than starch)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(cellulose, be stronger than amylose)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(cellulose, be more rigid than starch)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(cellulose, be stronger than starch)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(cellulose, be more rigid than starch)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(cellulose, is less reactive)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(cellulose, be more rigid than starch)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(cellulose, be stronger than amylose)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(cellulose, be more rigid than starch)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(cellulose, is less reactive)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(cellulose, be more rigid than starch)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(cellulose, be used by starch)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(cellulose, be more rigid than starch)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(cellulose, be different from starch)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(cellulose, be more rigid than starch)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(cellulose, be stronger than starch)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(cellulose, be more rigid than starch)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(cellulose, digest than starch)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(cellulose, be more rigid than starch)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(cellulose, is less reactive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(cellulose, be more rigid than starch)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(cellulose, digest than starch)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(cellulose, be more rigid than starch)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(cellulose, be stronger than amylose)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(cellulose, be more rigid than starch)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(cellulose, be different from starch)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(cellulose, be more rigid than starch)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(cellulose, is less reactive)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(cellulose, be more rigid than starch)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cellulose, digest than starch)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(cellulose, be more rigid than starch)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(cellulose, be different from starch)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(cellulose, be more rigid than starch)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(cellulose, be used by starch)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(cellulose, be more rigid than starch)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(cellulose, be more rigid than starch)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(cellulose, be more rigid than starch)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(cellulose, be more rigid than starch)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(cellulose, be more rigid than starch)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(cellulose, be more rigid than starch)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(polymer, be more elastic than metals)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(cellulose, be more rigid than starch)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(polymer, be more ductile than metals)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(cellulose, be more rigid than starch)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(polymer, be more elastic than metals)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(cellulose, be more rigid than starch)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(polymer, be more ductile than metals)