cemetery: have iron fences

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents historical site
Weight: 0.65
, place
Weight: 0.63
, site
Weight: 0.63
, property
Weight: 0.62
Siblings church
Weight: 0.66
, monument
Weight: 0.36
, graveyard
Weight: 0.35
, memorial
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have iron fences 1.00
have fences 0.94
have fences around them 0.90
have walls 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cemetery, have iron fences)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(graveyard, have fences)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(cemetery, have iron fences)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(graveyard, have fences)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(graveyard, have fences)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(cemetery, have iron fences)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(cemetery, have iron fences)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(cemetery, have iron fences)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(cemetery, have fences)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(cemetery, have iron fences)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(cemetery, have fences around them)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(cemetery, have iron fences)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(cemetery, have fences)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(cemetery, have iron fences)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(cemetery, have fences around them)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(cemetery, have iron fences)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(cemetery, have fences around them)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(cemetery, have iron fences)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(cemetery, have iron fences)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cemetery, have iron fences)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(cemetery, have iron fences)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(cemetery, have iron fences)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cemetery, have iron fences)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(graveyard, have fences)