cemetery: have fences around them

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents historical site
Weight: 0.65
, place
Weight: 0.63
, site
Weight: 0.63
, property
Weight: 0.62
Siblings church
Weight: 0.66
, monument
Weight: 0.36
, graveyard
Weight: 0.35
, memorial
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have fences around them 1.00
have fences 0.95
have iron fences 0.90
have gates around them 0.85
have walls 0.77
have gates 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cemetery, have fences around them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(graveyard, have fences)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cemetery, have fences around them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(graveyard, have gates)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(cemetery, have fences around them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(graveyard, have fences) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(graveyard, have fences)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(cemetery, have fences around them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(graveyard, have gates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(graveyard, have gates)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(cemetery, have fences around them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(cemetery, have fences around them)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(cemetery, have fences around them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cemetery, have iron fences)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(cemetery, have fences around them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(cemetery, have fences)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(cemetery, have fences around them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(cemetery, have fences)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(cemetery, have fences around them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(cemetery, have fences)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(cemetery, have fences around them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(cemetery, have iron fences)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(cemetery, have fences around them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(cemetery, have fences around them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cemetery, have fences around them)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(cemetery, have fences around them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(cemetery, have fences around them)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cemetery, have fences around them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(graveyard, have fences)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cemetery, have fences around them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(graveyard, have gates)