central america: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents south america
Weight: 0.79
, north america
Weight: 0.78
, latin america
Weight: 0.70
, continent
Weight: 0.68
Siblings argentina
Weight: 0.70
, united states
Weight: 0.70
, puerto rico
Weight: 0.69
, venezuela
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(latin america, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(central america, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(central america, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(latin america, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(central america, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(latin america, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(latin america, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(central america, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(central america, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(central america, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(central america, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(central america, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(central america, has quality bad)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(central america, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(central america, has quality bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(central america, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(central america, has quality bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(central america, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(central america, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(central america, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(central america, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(central america, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(central america, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(central america, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(central america, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(latin america, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(central america, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(latin america, has quality good)