latin america: has quality good

Related concepts

Parents	south africa Weight: 0.79 , north america Weight: 0.78 , africa Weight: 0.76 , south america Weight: 0.73 , european union Weight: 0.72
Siblings	puerto rico Weight: 0.73 , central america Weight: 0.70 , argentina Weight: 0.68 , peru Weight: 0.67 , canada Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality good	1.00
is great	0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(european union, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(latin america, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(latin america, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(european union, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(latin america, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(european union, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(latin america, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(central america, has quality good)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(latin america, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(canada, has quality good)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(latin america, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(canada, is great)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(european union, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

Remarkable(latin america, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(latin america, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(latin america, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

Remarkable(canada, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Plausible(canada, has quality good)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(latin america, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

Remarkable(central america, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Plausible(central america, has quality good)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(latin america, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

Remarkable(canada, is great) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Plausible(canada, is great)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(latin america, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Salient(latin america, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.97

Salient(latin america, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Salient(latin america, is great)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.91

Typical(latin america, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Typical(latin america, is great)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(latin america, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Plausible(latin america, is great)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.74

Remarkable(latin america, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(latin america, is great)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.97

Salient(latin america, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(latin america, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(latin america, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(latin america, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(latin america, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(latin america, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(european union, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(latin america, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(central america, has quality good)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(latin america, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(canada, has quality good)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(latin america, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(canada, is great)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.91

Typical(latin america, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(european union, has quality good)