central park: be considered achievement in science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents park
Weight: 0.89
, attraction
Weight: 0.72
, location
Weight: 0.71
, landmark
Weight: 0.70
, center
Weight: 0.69
Siblings yellowstone national park
Weight: 0.42
, national park
Weight: 0.41
, national parks
Weight: 0.39
, amusement park
Weight: 0.38
, city
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered achievement in science 1.00
achievement in science 0.98
be considered achievement 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(park, be considered achievement in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(central park, be considered achievement in science)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(central park, be considered achievement in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(park, be considered achievement in science)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(central park, be considered achievement in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(park, be considered achievement in science)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(park, be considered achievement in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(central park, be considered achievement in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(central park, be considered achievement in science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(central park, be considered achievement in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(central park, be considered achievement in science)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(central park, be considered achievement in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(central park, achievement in science)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(central park, be considered achievement in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(central park, achievement in science)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(central park, be considered achievement in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(central park, achievement in science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(central park, be considered achievement in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(central park, achievement in science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(central park, be considered achievement in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(central park, be considered achievement)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(central park, be considered achievement in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(central park, be considered achievement)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(central park, be considered achievement in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(central park, be considered achievement)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(central park, be considered achievement in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(central park, be considered achievement)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(central park, be considered achievement in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(central park, be considered achievement in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(central park, be considered achievement in science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(central park, be considered achievement in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(central park, be considered achievement in science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(central park, be considered achievement in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(park, be considered achievement in science)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(central park, be considered achievement in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(park, be considered achievement in science)