central park: be important to people of city

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents park
Weight: 0.89
, attraction
Weight: 0.72
, location
Weight: 0.71
, landmark
Weight: 0.70
, center
Weight: 0.69
Siblings yellowstone national park
Weight: 0.42
, national park
Weight: 0.41
, national parks
Weight: 0.39
, amusement park
Weight: 0.38
, city
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to people of city 1.00
be important to people of new city 0.97
be important to people 0.90
be important to people of york city 0.83
be important to people of new york city 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(park, be important to people of new york city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(central park, be important to people of city)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(park, be important to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(central park, be important to people of city)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(central park, be important to people of city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(park, be important to people)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(central park, be important to people of city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(park, be important to people of new york city)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(central park, be important to people of city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(park, be important to people)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(central park, be important to people of city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(park, be important to people of new york city)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(park, be important to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(central park, be important to people of city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(central park, be important to people of city)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(park, be important to people of new york city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(central park, be important to people of city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(central park, be important to people of city)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(central park, be important to people of city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(central park, be important to people of city)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(central park, be important to people of city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(central park, be important to people of new city)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(central park, be important to people of city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(central park, be important to people of new city)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(central park, be important to people of city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(central park, be important to people)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(central park, be important to people of city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(central park, be important to people of new city)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(central park, be important to people of city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(central park, be important to people)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(central park, be important to people of city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(central park, be important to people of york city)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(central park, be important to people of city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(central park, be important to people of new york city)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(central park, be important to people of city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(central park, be important to people)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(central park, be important to people of city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(central park, be important to people of new city)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(central park, be important to people of city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(central park, be important to people of york city)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(central park, be important to people of city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(central park, be important to people of new york city)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(central park, be important to people of city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(central park, be important to people of york city)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(central park, be important to people of city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(central park, be important to people)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(central park, be important to people of city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(central park, be important to people of new york city)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(central park, be important to people of city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(central park, be important to people of new york city)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(central park, be important to people of city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(central park, be important to people of york city)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(central park, be important to people of city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(central park, be important to people of city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(central park, be important to people of city)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(central park, be important to people of city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(central park, be important to people of city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(central park, be important to people of city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(park, be important to people)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(central park, be important to people of city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(park, be important to people of new york city)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(central park, be important to people of city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(park, be important to people)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(central park, be important to people of city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(park, be important to people of new york city)