park: be important to people of new york city

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents location
Weight: 0.67
, playground
Weight: 0.67
, site
Weight: 0.66
, attraction
Weight: 0.66
, property
Weight: 0.63
Siblings central park
Weight: 0.89
, yellowstone national park
Weight: 0.80
, death valley
Weight: 0.68
, joshua tree
Weight: 0.67
, walt disney world
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to people of new york city 1.00
be important to people of york city 0.99
be important to new york 0.94
was in new york 0.92
be important to york 0.91
was in york 0.89
is york 0.89
was in new york created 0.89
be important to people of new city 0.86
was in york created 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(site, is york)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(park, be important to people of new york city)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(park, be important to people of new york city)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(site, is york)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(park, be important to people of new york city)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(site, is york)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(park, be important to people of new york city)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(central park, was in york created)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(park, be important to people of new york city)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(central park, be important to people of new york city)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(park, be important to people of new york city)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(central park, be important to york)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(park, be important to people of new york city)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(central park, be important to people of york city)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(park, be important to people of new york city)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(central park, be important to new york)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(park, be important to people of new york city)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(central park, was in york)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(park, be important to people of new york city)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(central park, be important to people of new city)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(park, be important to people of new york city)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(central park, was in new york created)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(park, be important to people of new york city)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(central park, was in new york)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(site, is york)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(park, be important to people of new york city)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(park, be important to people of new york city)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(park, be important to people of new york city)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(central park, be important to people of new york city)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(central park, be important to people of new york city)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(park, be important to people of new york city)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(central park, be important to people of york city)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(central park, be important to people of york city)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(park, be important to people of new york city)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(central park, be important to new york)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(central park, be important to new york)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(park, be important to people of new york city)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(central park, was in new york)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(central park, was in new york)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(park, be important to people of new york city)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(central park, be important to york)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(central park, be important to york)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(park, be important to people of new york city)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(central park, was in york)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(central park, was in york)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(park, be important to people of new york city)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(central park, was in new york created)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(central park, was in new york created)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(park, be important to people of new york city)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(central park, was in york created)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(central park, was in york created)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(park, be important to people of new york city)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(central park, be important to people of new city)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(central park, be important to people of new city)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(park, be important to people of new york city)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(park, be important to people of new york city)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(park, be important to people of new york city)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(park, be important to new york)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(park, be important to people of new york city)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(park, be important to new york)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(park, be important to people of new york city)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(park, be important to new york)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(park, be important to people of new york city)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(park, was in new york created)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(park, be important to people of new york city)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(park, was in new york created)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(park, be important to people of new york city)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(park, was in new york created)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(park, be important to people of new york city)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(park, was in new york created)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(park, be important to people of new york city)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(park, be important to new york)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(park, be important to people of new york city)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(park, be important to people of new york city)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(park, be important to people of new york city)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(park, be important to people of new york city)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(park, be important to people of new york city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(park, be important to people of new york city)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(site, is york)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(park, be important to people of new york city)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(central park, was in york)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(park, be important to people of new york city)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(central park, was in new york)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(park, be important to people of new york city)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(central park, was in york created)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(park, be important to people of new york city)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(central park, was in new york created)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(park, be important to people of new york city)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(central park, be important to people of york city)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(park, be important to people of new york city)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(central park, be important to people of new york city)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(park, be important to people of new york city)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(central park, be important to york)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(park, be important to people of new york city)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(central park, be important to new york)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(park, be important to people of new york city)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(central park, be important to people of new city)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(park, be important to people of new york city)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(site, is york)