central park: was in new york

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents park
Weight: 0.89
, attraction
Weight: 0.72
, location
Weight: 0.71
, landmark
Weight: 0.70
, center
Weight: 0.69
Siblings yellowstone national park
Weight: 0.42
, national park
Weight: 0.41
, national parks
Weight: 0.39
, amusement park
Weight: 0.38
, city
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
was in new york 1.00
was in york 0.98
be important to new york 0.97
was in new york created 0.96
be important to york 0.95
was in york created 0.94
be important to people of new york city 0.92
be important to people of york city 0.90
be in nyc 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(park, be important to new york)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(central park, was in new york)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(park, be important to people of new york city)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(central park, was in new york)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(park, was in new york created)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(central park, was in new york)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(central park, was in new york)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(park, was in new york created)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(central park, was in new york)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(park, be important to new york)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(central park, was in new york)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(park, be important to people of new york city)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(central park, was in new york)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(park, was in new york created)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(central park, was in new york)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(park, be important to people of new york city)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(central park, was in new york)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(park, be important to new york)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(park, be important to new york)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(central park, was in new york)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(central park, was in new york)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(park, was in new york created)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(central park, was in new york)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(central park, was in new york)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(park, be important to people of new york city)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(central park, was in new york)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(central park, was in new york)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(central park, was in new york)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(central park, was in new york)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(central park, was in new york)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(central park, was in york created)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(central park, was in new york)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(central park, was in york)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(central park, was in new york)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(central park, was in york)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(central park, was in new york)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(central park, be important to new york)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(central park, was in new york)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(central park, was in york created)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(central park, was in new york)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(central park, was in new york created)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(central park, was in new york)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(central park, be important to york)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(central park, was in new york)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(central park, be important to people of new york city)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(central park, was in new york)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(central park, be important to people of york city)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(central park, was in new york)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(central park, was in york)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(central park, was in new york)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(central park, was in new york created)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(central park, was in new york)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(central park, was in york created)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(central park, was in new york)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(central park, was in york)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(central park, was in new york)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(central park, be important to new york)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(central park, was in new york)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(central park, be important to york)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(central park, was in new york)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(central park, be important to people of new york city)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(central park, was in new york)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(central park, be in nyc)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(central park, was in new york)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(central park, be important to people of york city)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(central park, was in new york)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(central park, was in york created)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(central park, was in new york)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(central park, was in new york created)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(central park, was in new york)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(central park, be in nyc)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(central park, was in new york)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(central park, was in new york created)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(central park, was in new york)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(central park, be important to york)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(central park, was in new york)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(central park, be important to new york)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(central park, was in new york)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(central park, be in nyc)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(central park, was in new york)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(central park, be important to people of york city)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(central park, was in new york)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(central park, be important to people of new york city)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(central park, was in new york)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(central park, be in nyc)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(central park, was in new york)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(central park, be important to york)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(central park, was in new york)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(central park, be important to new york)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(central park, was in new york)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(central park, be important to people of york city)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(central park, was in new york)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(central park, be important to people of new york city)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(central park, was in new york)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(central park, was in new york)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(central park, was in new york)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(central park, was in new york)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(central park, was in new york)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(central park, was in new york)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(park, was in new york created)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(central park, was in new york)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(park, be important to new york)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(central park, was in new york)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(park, be important to people of new york city)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(central park, was in new york)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(park, was in new york created)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(central park, was in new york)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(park, be important to new york)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(central park, was in new york)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(park, be important to people of new york city)