centrosome: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.50
, center
Weight: 0.35
Siblings extracellular matrix
Weight: 0.33
, organelle
Weight: 0.33
, lipid bilayer
Weight: 0.33
, vesicle
Weight: 0.32
, helix
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality worth 0.82
wait music poor quality 0.81
has quality definition 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(structure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(centrosome, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(center, wait music poor quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(centrosome, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(centrosome, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(center, wait music poor quality)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(centrosome, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(structure, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(centrosome, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(center, wait music poor quality)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(centrosome, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(structure, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(centrosome, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lipid bilayer, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(centrosome, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(lipid bilayer, has quality worth)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(centrosome, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(lipid bilayer, has quality definition)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(structure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(centrosome, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(centrosome, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(center, wait music poor quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(centrosome, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(centrosome, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(centrosome, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(lipid bilayer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(lipid bilayer, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(centrosome, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(lipid bilayer, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(lipid bilayer, has quality worth)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(centrosome, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(lipid bilayer, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(lipid bilayer, has quality definition)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(centrosome, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(centrosome, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(centrosome, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(centrosome, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(centrosome, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(centrosome, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(centrosome, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(centrosome, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(centrosome, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(centrosome, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(centrosome, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(centrosome, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(centrosome, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(centrosome, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(centrosome, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(centrosome, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(structure, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(centrosome, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(center, wait music poor quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(centrosome, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(lipid bilayer, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(centrosome, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(lipid bilayer, has quality worth)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(centrosome, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(lipid bilayer, has quality definition)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(centrosome, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(structure, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(centrosome, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(center, wait music poor quality)