ceo: get fired more than male ones

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vice president
Weight: 0.65
, officer
Weight: 0.64
, executive
Weight: 0.61
, corporation
Weight: 0.59
, speaker
Weight: 0.59
Siblings chairman
Weight: 0.36
, director
Weight: 0.34
, founder
Weight: 0.34
, chief
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
get fired more than male ones 1.00
get fired 0.85
is fired 0.82
is male 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(executive, get fired)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(ceo, get fired more than male ones)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(ceo, get fired more than male ones)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(executive, get fired)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ceo, get fired more than male ones)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(executive, get fired)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ceo, get fired more than male ones)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(director, get fired)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ceo, get fired more than male ones)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(director, is male)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ceo, get fired more than male ones)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(founder, get fired)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ceo, get fired more than male ones)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(founder, is fired)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(executive, get fired)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(ceo, get fired more than male ones)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(ceo, get fired more than male ones)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(ceo, get fired more than male ones)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(founder, is fired)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(founder, is fired)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(ceo, get fired more than male ones)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(founder, get fired)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(founder, get fired)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(ceo, get fired more than male ones)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(director, get fired)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(director, get fired)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(ceo, get fired more than male ones)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(director, is male)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(director, is male)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(ceo, get fired more than male ones)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(ceo, get fired more than male ones)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(ceo, get fired more than male ones)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(ceo, get fired)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(ceo, get fired more than male ones)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(ceo, is fired)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(ceo, get fired more than male ones)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(ceo, get fired)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(ceo, get fired more than male ones)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(ceo, is fired)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(ceo, get fired more than male ones)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ceo, is male)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(ceo, get fired more than male ones)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(ceo, is fired)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(ceo, get fired more than male ones)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(ceo, is fired)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(ceo, get fired more than male ones)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(ceo, get fired)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(ceo, get fired more than male ones)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(ceo, get fired)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(ceo, get fired more than male ones)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(ceo, is male)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(ceo, get fired more than male ones)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(ceo, is male)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(ceo, get fired more than male ones)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(ceo, is male)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(ceo, get fired more than male ones)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(ceo, get fired more than male ones)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ceo, get fired more than male ones)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(ceo, get fired more than male ones)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(ceo, get fired more than male ones)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ceo, get fired more than male ones)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(executive, get fired)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ceo, get fired more than male ones)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(founder, is fired)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ceo, get fired more than male ones)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(founder, get fired)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ceo, get fired more than male ones)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(director, get fired)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ceo, get fired more than male ones)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(director, is male)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(ceo, get fired more than male ones)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(executive, get fired)