ceo: is fired

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vice president
Weight: 0.65
, officer
Weight: 0.64
, executive
Weight: 0.61
, corporation
Weight: 0.59
, speaker
Weight: 0.59
Siblings chairman
Weight: 0.36
, director
Weight: 0.34
, founder
Weight: 0.34
, chief
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is fired 1.00
get fired 0.98
get fired more than male ones 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(executive, get fired)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(ceo, is fired)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(ceo, is fired)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(executive, get fired)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(ceo, is fired)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(executive, get fired)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(ceo, is fired)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(director, get fired)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(ceo, is fired)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(founder, get fired)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(ceo, is fired)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(founder, is fired)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(executive, get fired)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(ceo, is fired)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(ceo, is fired)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(ceo, is fired)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(founder, is fired)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(founder, is fired)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(ceo, is fired)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(founder, get fired)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(founder, get fired)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(ceo, is fired)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(director, get fired)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(director, get fired)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(ceo, is fired)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(ceo, is fired)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(ceo, is fired)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(ceo, get fired)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(ceo, is fired)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(ceo, get fired)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(ceo, is fired)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ceo, get fired more than male ones)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(ceo, is fired)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(ceo, get fired)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(ceo, is fired)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(ceo, get fired more than male ones)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(ceo, is fired)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(ceo, get fired)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(ceo, is fired)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(ceo, get fired more than male ones)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(ceo, is fired)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(ceo, get fired more than male ones)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(ceo, is fired)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(ceo, is fired)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(ceo, is fired)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(ceo, is fired)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(ceo, is fired)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(ceo, is fired)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(executive, get fired)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(ceo, is fired)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(founder, is fired)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(ceo, is fired)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(founder, get fired)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(ceo, is fired)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(director, get fired)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(ceo, is fired)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(executive, get fired)