ceramic: is material

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents medium
Weight: 0.59
, alloy
Weight: 0.59
, gift
Weight: 0.59
, industry
Weight: 0.58
, polymer
Weight: 0.58
Siblings silicon carbide
Weight: 0.73
, resin
Weight: 0.35
, acrylic
Weight: 0.35
, plastic
Weight: 0.35
, pottery
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is material 1.00
is synthetic material 0.83
be better material use for medicine bottle 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be better material use for medicine bottle)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, is material)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is material)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(ceramic, is material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(plastic, is material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(plastic, is material)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(ceramic, is material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(acrylic, is material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(acrylic, is material)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(ceramic, is material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(plastic, be better material use for medicine bottle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(plastic, be better material use for medicine bottle)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(ceramic, is material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(ceramic, is material)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(ceramic, is material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(ceramic, is synthetic material)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(ceramic, is material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is synthetic material)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(ceramic, is material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(ceramic, is synthetic material)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(ceramic, is material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(ceramic, is synthetic material)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(ceramic, is material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(ceramic, is material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is material)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(ceramic, is material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(ceramic, is material)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(plastic, is material)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(acrylic, is material)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, is material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(plastic, be better material use for medicine bottle)