plastic: is material

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents polymer
Weight: 0.72
, type
Weight: 0.63
, material
Weight: 0.58
, item
Weight: 0.58
, electronic device
Weight: 0.57
Siblings plastic wrap
Weight: 0.76
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.72
, acrylic
Weight: 0.66
, silicone
Weight: 0.66
, trash bag
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
is material 1.00
is material used 0.96
is good material 0.95
is material used for nosecones 0.95
be considered material 0.94
be good material use 0.92
is good material used 0.92
is popular material 0.92
is useful material 0.91
is good material used for nosecones 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is material)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, is good material)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is material)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, is material)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is material)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, be considered material)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(plastic, is material)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(acrylic, is material)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(acrylic, is material)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(plastic, is material)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(acrylic, be considered material)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(acrylic, be considered material)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(plastic, is material)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(acrylic, is good material)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(acrylic, is good material)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(plastic, is material)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(plastic, is material)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(plastic, is material)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is good material)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(plastic, is material)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(plastic, is good material)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(plastic, is material)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(plastic, is good material)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(plastic, is material)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(plastic, is good material)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(plastic, is material)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(plastic, is material)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is material)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(plastic, is material)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(plastic, is material)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is material)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(acrylic, be considered material)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is material)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(acrylic, is material)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is material)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(acrylic, is good material)