cereal: get soggy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents starch
Weight: 0.69
, dairy product
Weight: 0.67
, grain
Weight: 0.64
, carbohydrate
Weight: 0.63
, staple
Weight: 0.62
Siblings wheat flour
Weight: 0.73
, wheat germ
Weight: 0.68
, barley
Weight: 0.67
, lentil
Weight: 0.64
, millet
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
get soggy 1.00
go mushy 0.78
is mushy 0.77
is soaked 0.76
is sticky 0.75
need soaked 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(cereal, get soggy)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(lentil, is mushy)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(cereal, get soggy)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(lentil, is soaked)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(cereal, get soggy)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(lentil, need soaked)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(cereal, get soggy)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(wheat flour, is sticky)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(cereal, get soggy)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(lentil, is soaked)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(lentil, is soaked)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(cereal, get soggy)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(lentil, is mushy)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(lentil, is mushy)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(cereal, get soggy)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(wheat flour, is sticky)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(wheat flour, is sticky)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(cereal, get soggy)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(lentil, need soaked)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(lentil, need soaked)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(cereal, get soggy)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(cereal, get soggy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(cereal, get soggy)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(cereal, get soggy)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(cereal, get soggy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(cereal, get soggy)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(cereal, get soggy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(cereal, get soggy)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(lentil, is soaked)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(cereal, get soggy)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(lentil, is mushy)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(cereal, get soggy)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(wheat flour, is sticky)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(cereal, get soggy)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(lentil, need soaked)