cerebellum: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.52
, central nervous system
Weight: 0.51
, region
Weight: 0.51
, brainstem
Weight: 0.50
, organ
Weight: 0.49
Siblings cerebral cortex
Weight: 0.34
, pineal gland
Weight: 0.33
, human brain
Weight: 0.33
, hippocampus
Weight: 0.33
, limbic system
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality worth 0.85
has quality worse 0.84
be in great deal 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(structure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(cerebellum, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(central nervous system, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(cerebellum, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(organ, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(cerebellum, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(central nervous system, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(cerebellum, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(central nervous system, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(cerebellum, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(cerebellum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(central nervous system, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(cerebellum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(structure, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(cerebellum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(central nervous system, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(cerebellum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(organ, has quality worth)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(cerebellum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(central nervous system, has quality worse)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(cerebellum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(central nervous system, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(cerebellum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(central nervous system, has quality worse)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(cerebellum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(central nervous system, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(cerebellum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(structure, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(cerebellum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(organ, has quality worth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(structure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(cerebellum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(cerebellum, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(central nervous system, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(cerebellum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(cerebellum, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(central nervous system, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(cerebellum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(cerebellum, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(organ, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(cerebellum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(cerebellum, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(central nervous system, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(cerebellum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(cerebellum, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(cerebellum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(cerebellum, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(cerebellum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(cerebellum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(cerebellum, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(cerebellum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(cerebellum, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(cerebellum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(central nervous system, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(cerebellum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(central nervous system, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(cerebellum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(organ, has quality worth)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(cerebellum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(structure, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(cerebellum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(central nervous system, has quality worse)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(cerebellum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(central nervous system, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(cerebellum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(structure, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(cerebellum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(central nervous system, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(cerebellum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(organ, has quality worth)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(cerebellum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(central nervous system, has quality worse)