chad: have poverty

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.58
, state
Weight: 0.54
, country
Weight: 0.54
, nation
Weight: 0.50
, person
Weight: 0.49
Siblings arkansas
Weight: 0.32
, central african republic
Weight: 0.32
, milwaukee
Weight: 0.32
, delaware
Weight: 0.32
, tennessee
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
have poverty 1.00
be in poverty 0.99
live in poverty 0.97
suffer from poverty 0.92
is impoverished 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(chad, have poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(central african republic, be in poverty)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(chad, have poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(central african republic, be in poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(central african republic, be in poverty)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(chad, have poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(chad, have poverty)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(chad, have poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chad, live in poverty)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(chad, have poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(chad, be in poverty)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(chad, have poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(chad, live in poverty)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(chad, have poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(chad, suffer from poverty)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(chad, have poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(chad, be in poverty)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(chad, have poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(chad, be in poverty)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(chad, have poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(chad, live in poverty)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(chad, have poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(chad, is impoverished)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(chad, have poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(chad, suffer from poverty)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(chad, have poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(chad, suffer from poverty)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(chad, have poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(chad, be in poverty)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(chad, have poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(chad, suffer from poverty)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(chad, have poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(chad, live in poverty)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(chad, have poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(chad, is impoverished)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(chad, have poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(chad, is impoverished)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(chad, have poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(chad, is impoverished)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(chad, have poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(chad, have poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(chad, have poverty)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(chad, have poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(chad, have poverty)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(chad, have poverty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(central african republic, be in poverty)