chad: live in poverty

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.58
, state
Weight: 0.54
, country
Weight: 0.54
, nation
Weight: 0.50
, person
Weight: 0.49
Siblings arkansas
Weight: 0.32
, central african republic
Weight: 0.32
, milwaukee
Weight: 0.32
, delaware
Weight: 0.32
, tennessee
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
live in poverty 1.00
be in poverty 0.97
have poverty 0.97
suffer from poverty 0.91
is impoverished 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chad, live in poverty)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(central african republic, be in poverty)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(chad, live in poverty)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(central african republic, be in poverty)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(central african republic, be in poverty)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(chad, live in poverty)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(chad, live in poverty)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(chad, live in poverty)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(chad, have poverty)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(chad, live in poverty)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(chad, have poverty)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(chad, live in poverty)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(chad, be in poverty)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(chad, live in poverty)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(chad, be in poverty)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(chad, live in poverty)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(chad, suffer from poverty)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(chad, live in poverty)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(chad, have poverty)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(chad, live in poverty)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(chad, be in poverty)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(chad, live in poverty)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(chad, suffer from poverty)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(chad, live in poverty)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(chad, be in poverty)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(chad, live in poverty)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(chad, suffer from poverty)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(chad, live in poverty)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(chad, is impoverished)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(chad, live in poverty)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(chad, suffer from poverty)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(chad, live in poverty)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(chad, have poverty)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(chad, live in poverty)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(chad, is impoverished)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(chad, live in poverty)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(chad, is impoverished)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(chad, live in poverty)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(chad, is impoverished)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(chad, live in poverty)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(chad, live in poverty)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chad, live in poverty)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(chad, live in poverty)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(chad, live in poverty)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chad, live in poverty)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(central african republic, be in poverty)